eHealth bill a threat to privacy, say health and rights groups

Groups want bill redrafted with right of patient consent enshrined


A number of BC health and civil liberties organizations say the province’s eHealth bill is a threat to personal freedoms and health information privacy.

Bill 24 would allow the provincial government to create massive electronic databanks of citizens’ personal health information.

And those databanks will be talking electronically to other
government databanks, says the BC Persons With AIDS Society chair Glyn Townson.

That means, for example, your health data could be shared with officials looking at your EI data. Bill 24 is due to receive its second reading in the Legislature in the next two weeks.

Townson says without any privacy protections, interlinked government databases will allow unsecured access to medical information.

He says this should concern everyone, but he singles out people with HIV/AIDS, people using birth control and women getting abortions.

The bill’s critics say public consultations on the bill have not
produced meaningful results.

They say the government’s failure to enshrine meaningful citizen control over medical information makes the government’s assurances of privacy meaningless.

Townson says he’s been working with committees on the legislation but says the government’s lack of consideration for people’s privacy has “sideswiped” those groups.

“I am dismayed, disappointed and somewhat angry,” says Townson, who estimates he’s spent 40 per cent of his recent time working with BCPWA working on the law.

Darrell Evans of the BC Freedom of Information and Privacy
Association says Bill 24 opens the door to massive security breaches.

“They are happening all the time,” he says. “We’re talking drug histories, genetic information, medical test results, you name it.

“And once your personal information gets out or on the internet, it’s there forever, beyond anyone’s control.”

The groups want Bill 24 to be redrafted with the right of patient consent and control enshrined, with only strictly limited exceptions for emergencies and audits.

Further, they say, that sensitive health information should never leave Canada without express consent.

Read More About:
Power, Health, News, Privacy, Vancouver, Media

Keep Reading

Job discrimination against trans and non-binary people is alive and well

OPINION: A study reveals that we have a long way to go to reach workplace equality for trans and non-binary people

The new generation of gay Conservative sellouts

OPINION: Melissa Lantsman’s and Eric Duncan’s refusals to call out their party’s transphobia is a betrayal of the LGBTQ2S+ community

Over 300 anti-LGBTQ2S+ bills have been introduced this year. This doesn’t mean we should panic

OPINION: While it’s important to watch out for threats, not all threats are created equally. Some of these bills will die a natural death

Xtra’s top LGBTQ2S+ stories of the year

The best and brightest—even most bewildering—stories from a back catalogue brimming with insight