Goliath wins again

If Little Sister's doesn't challenge Canada Customs, who will?


The David and Goliath story continues; Goliath is still winning.

Little Sister’s protracted struggle with Canada Customs just keeps hitting the wall, thanks in large part to the Supreme Court of Canada.

In its latest decision, the Supreme Court refused to award Little Sister’s with advance costs to fund its on-going lawsuit over repeated seizures of its books by border cops.

It’s not like the Supreme Court hasn’t acknowledged that Customs discriminates against Little Sister’s. In 2000 the court told the agency in no uncertain terms to stop violating Little Sister’s Charter rights by targeting lesbian and gay material. But the court upheld the border cops’ censorship regime.

Two years later, Little Sister’s filed an appeal against the seizure of two collections of gay adult comics, some with SM themes. Border cops then seized a few more titles, this time gay erotic fiction collections. Preparing once again to go into battle against an opponent with very deep pockets (funded by us taxpayers), Little Sister’s lawyer Joe Arvay asked the judge to make a rarely used order for advance costs, to help Little Sister’s pay for its formidable legal bills.

In 2004, a trial judge awarded Little Sister’s $300,000 in advance costs from the government, as the bookstore argued it could not afford to proceed without the money. That decision was overruled by the BC Court of Appeal, which said the case didn’t merit advance costs. On Jan 19, the Supreme Court agreed that the case was “simply not important enough” to justify making the government foot the bill.

In order to get advance costs, a case has to be very exceptional, of significant public importance to Canadians. The majority of the Supreme Court decided that Little Sister’s just wasn’t exceptional enough. In their view, the issues raised were too narrow and just too insignificant to the public at large.

Too narrow and insignificant?

The majority of the court said the appeal was really just about whether the bookstore could import these four books. And really, who cares about these four books?

But the case is not just about these four books. It is about the continued targeting of gay and lesbian materials at Canada’s borders by unaccountable government officials. It is about the flaunting of a Supreme Court order to stop harassing gay and lesbian bookstores. It is about the legitimacy and constitutionality of community standards and the obscenity legislation that allows this censorship to continue.

Unaccountable government censors flaunting court orders doesn’t sound particularly narrow to me. It sounds like a pretty important public issue.

It is certainly legitimate to make it hard to get advance costs. It makes sense that it is a rare award, only available in exceptional circumstances. But if this case isn’t unbelievably, totally, exceptional, I don’t know what is.

 

Little Sister’s has been battling the border cops for two decades. They have even won legal victories against them. But those victories have been entirely pyrrhic since Customs just seems to ignore them.

As the dissenting opinion by Justice W Ian Binnie noted, the issue at stake “is whether the rights established in the [first Little Sister’s case] in principle have become rights in reality.”

Without the money, Little Sister’s is declaring defeat. And if Little Sister’s doesn’t continue its challenge, who will?

The answer is quite likely no one. It takes a huge amount of time and money–and just raw tenacity–to continue this kind of battle against a government department that apparently knows no limit. It certainly doesn’t make sense from a business point of view. Defending these books costs more money than they could ever dream of making by selling them.

And because of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, there is no more Court Challenges Program, so there is nowhere else to turn to level the playing field.

So Goliath, the unrelenting censor, is winning, thanks in no small part to the timidity of the Supreme Court, and to Canadian taxpayers who fund the deep pockets of Canada Customs.

This battle is important. But Little Sister’s can’t do it alone. We all now need to step up and help them.

Brenda Cossman

Brenda Cossman is a professor of law at the University of Toronto, the author of Sexual Citizens: The Legal and Cultural Regulation of Sex and Belonging (Stanford University Press) and a former board member of Pink Triangle Press, Xtra’s publisher.

Keep Reading

The new generation of gay Conservative sellouts

OPINION: Melissa Lantsman’s and Eric Duncan’s refusals to call out their party’s transphobia is a betrayal of the LGBTQ2S+ community

Over 300 anti-LGBTQ2S+ bills have been introduced this year. This doesn’t mean we should panic

OPINION: While it’s important to watch out for threats, not all threats are created equally. Some of these bills will die a natural death

Xtra’s top LGBTQ2S+ stories of the year

The best and brightest—even most bewildering—stories from a back catalogue brimming with insight

Elon Musk and Texas attorney general Ken Paxton are suing Media Matters. Here’s why queer and trans people should care

OPINION: When politicians and the rich leverage the power of the state to quell dissent, we all lose