Parents still suing Vancouver School Board for trans policy

Letting trans students choose washroom doesn’t infringe others’ rights: VSB


Three parents who filed a lawsuit last fall against the Vancouver School Board (VSB) for its new policy on trans students still hope for their day in court.

The parents’ lawyer, Masao Morinaga, confirmed to Daily Xtra that he intends to carry on with the lawsuit. He says he is waiting on an exchange of documents with the school board before the case can see court.

The VSB’s sexual orientation and gender identities policy, amended in June 2014, allows students to use washrooms according to their chosen gender identity, and allows students who feel unsafe telling their families about their gender identity to request confidentiality from teachers and counsellors.

Three parents filed a petition to the BC Supreme Court claiming the policy would make their children uncomfortable, deny parents important knowledge about their children, and disrupt basic public morality.

The parents’ petition is one skirmish in an ongoing conflict between queer activists and a vocal, conservative segment of the Vancouver Chinese community. The three parents who brought the petition have declined to speak to the press, but their names, as well as the names on almost all of nearly 200 affidavits filed in their support, are identifiably Mandarin Chinese.

In response to the parents’ petition, the VSB says letting trans students choose which washroom to use does not take away anyone else’s rights.

“The petitioners lack standing to bring this petition as no legal right of the petitioners is implicated by the adoption of the policy,” says a brief from VSB trustees, filed with the court in December. “The adoption of the policy does not affect the right, privileges or interests of any of the Petitioners . . . The revised policy does not discriminate against non-trans* students.”

The brief also dismisses arguments based on city building codes and the school act, saying the petitioners misunderstood the laws.

The VSB brief is especially disparaging of the petition’s arguments about public morals: “The petitioners’ assertion that society ‘typically divides washroom and change room facilities based on sex’ and the assertion that ‘separate use of such facilities is founded on the general moral values of our society’ is not consistent with our current non-discriminatory practices and indeed would in fact be a discriminatory practice.”

The main argument from the VSB, however, comes down to personal choice. In response to a line in the parents’ petition that argues the government should not meddle with washrooms because their use comes down to “fundamental personal choices,” the VSB brief wryly replies, “that is consistent with the adoption of the Revised Policy.”

 

In other words, the brief suggests, the policy indeed comes down to personal choice and allowing trans students to use whichever washroom they choose.

The parents want the court to overturn the VSB policy and declare it unconstitutional, or at least return it to the board for further debate.

Niko Bell

Niko Bell is a writer, editor and translator from Vancouver. He writes about sexual health, science, food and language.

Read More About:
Power, News, Vancouver, Education

Keep Reading

The new generation of gay Conservative sellouts

OPINION: Melissa Lantsman’s and Eric Duncan’s refusals to call out their party’s transphobia is a betrayal of the LGBTQ2S+ community

Over 300 anti-LGBTQ2S+ bills have been introduced this year. This doesn’t mean we should panic

OPINION: While it’s important to watch out for threats, not all threats are created equally. Some of these bills will die a natural death

Xtra’s top LGBTQ2S+ stories of the year

The best and brightest—even most bewildering—stories from a back catalogue brimming with insight

Elon Musk and Texas attorney general Ken Paxton are suing Media Matters. Here’s why queer and trans people should care

OPINION: When politicians and the rich leverage the power of the state to quell dissent, we all lose